Opinion, by Glen T Brown
The
International Village BIA luncheon series at Ferguson Station and Gore Park
organizers held auditions a few weeks ago. They had a panel of about five or
six representatives from different BIAs around the city. They had published
posters and put the word out that they were holding auditions for summer
musicians, and that they would be paid.
I traveled
down to the Ferguson Station location with one of the groups who was
auditioning. The day had been full, and many bands and performers had taken
part.
A week
later, a list was produced and published with the names of the successful
groups, when they were playing and where. Very good news. New gigs and
musicians getting work.
So, how
much did they get paid?
The BIA
reps were saying to the performers, "Bring your expectations of your
pay with you to your audition."
They were
paying the musicians what they thought they were worth. I suppose some bands
got paid more than others. I suppose if they were willing to pay for free then
the BIA would be okay with that.
As my
friend and I talked, the question came up, "Are these union bands? Is the
union involved?"
There was a
day when the musicians union would be all over something like this. They would
be making sure that the musicians were all members of the local, possibly
checking them for their union cards and making sure that all performances were
booked and paid according to union pay scale.
But not
these days.
Has the
union disappeared? No. Does it still collect dues? Yes. Does it still exist to
protect the working conditions of musicians in the City of Hamilton? Yes it does. (Actually, it is bound
to act on behalf of its members.) Does the union publicly endorse the absurd
idea that musicians should work for free if they feel like it? Of course not.
However, by
NOT showing up or being involved in a public audition like this, the musicians
association sends a message to every “respectable” professional musician in the
city of Hamilton.
And the message is, "Go ahead and work for nothing if you want to.”
Isn’t that
what everyone's doing these days? Playing for nothing, I mean.
I’m torn
between who to be concerned with!
Should we
find fault with the BIA for holding public auditions without inviting the
musicians union to be involved, or should we be asking the musicians union why
they weren’t paying attention, or at least commenting about what is going on?
One thing
is for sure: an audition series is a huge opportunity for the union not to just
have a watchdog function, but to have some input and establish its voice.
Rather than
allow the BIA to take advantage of the current market, and unabashedly use the
sliding "pay-what-you-want" system, I’d like to suggest a new plan
for next year.
Imagine For A Minute…
Imagine the
president of our musicians' association (or their designate) sitting down with
the BIA and saying, on behalf of all performing musicians (and potential
musicians’ union members) in the city, "Look, you're hiring musicians from
around the city. This is a great opportunity for you to put value into the
musicians' market. This is a great opportunity for you to attract some of our
city's best talent, and to make a public statement about how musicians' work is
important and valuable. What can we agree
on will be your guaranteed payment for each musician you choose? We see
music as an integral and indispensable part of any marketing strategy for
business improvement. We see musicians as partners in the growth and renewal of
our businesses and our city. We should publicly agree together on what they are
worth when they're getting paid."
Hey, here’s
something interesting: the aims of our local BIAs and our local musicians
community have a lot in common. We both want to see people coming out to shop,
spend money and have a good time.
I propose
that the local BIAs should be the first to craft a partnership agreement or a “letter
of understanding” with the musicians’ union. Wouldn’t that light a fire under
the local musicians who have been paying their dues and working hard at their
craft? Wouldn’t that be a nice gesture of good faith and bridge-building from
our local businesses, who often are being left to hire just any old “discount”
musician that comes along, and then they aren’t satisfied with the result?
Imagine the good news working its way through the community, as the work of
musicians is affirmed.
In some forms of art, artists seek
funding through meticulous, time-consuming and distracting grant applications.
But If a musician auditions and is good enough, they get the gig! Call-backs
and hiring are almost instantaneous.
Therefore, in
our imaginary scenario, if money has been made available to pay musicians for
performing, the impact of hiring those musicians at a decent, agreed-upon pay
rate will be immediate.
Think of
how quickly the word will get out, “We were hired by the BIA for such and such
gig, and here’s what they are agreeing to pay us!”
What an
opportunity! Imagine the benefit of having our musicians’ union, a professional
and international association, sitting down to forge an agreement with our BIAs
for next year’s summer performances.
All musicians
will benefit from this kind of support. At the very least, we will know that
the bands who were hired for the gig were the best bands, not simply the
cheapest!
Without an agreed upon payment,
stated up front, all we can conclude is that they hired the cheapest musicians,
not necessarily the best.
And that
stinks.
Musicians
need an advocate working for them more than ever. Musicians are at the mercy of
venues, when they are being told, "Bring your expectations about pay with
you," to an audition. It makes you think that if you priced yourself too
high then you would fail your audition.
Musicians
need help and representation to talk to venue operators and have a dialogue and
try to improve their prospects.
For next
year’s auditions, I think it would be nice if the local musicians’ union showed
up and took some interest.
----------------------------
Glen Brown is a newly reinstated member of the Hamilton Musicians’ Guild, Local 293, Canadian Federation
of Musicians. He reinstated his
membership without penalty. Membership initiation fees are waived until June
30th. Go to http://www.hamiltonmusicians.org
2 comments:
I hear you Glen. I auditioned for the IDBIA last year with an eminently hireable professional show.
I quoted my usual fair price of $150 for the first set,
plus $50 for doing my own sound. It's peanuts, really.
But after nailing the audition and chatting with the jury afterwards to help them get to know me, I didn't get the gig. They didn't get back to me. I had to call them.
I wondered if they simply didn't want to pay anything.
Musicians worry about union membership becoming an obstacle in terms of fees and constraints on gigging, not to mention that many musicians are free-spirits.
I'm not sure the booking bodies care about getting top quality acts as long as the act is passable. In this respect they are following the lead of audience members who don't really have any expectations about quality, for reasons that have become the big debate of these last few years.
-Pip
metroPhilmusic.com
metroPhilmusic@gmail.com
Excellent article Glen. Sadly, musicians are so desperate for gigs, they're now paying to get them ie. "what kind of draw do you have". "You have to bring at least 30 people" etc. As long as musicians agree to work for nothing, nothing is what they will get. Musician's Union? Hmmmm
Post a Comment